WarrantyClaimExpert

Business Valuation (Warranted vs True Position)

Independent valuation of the business under warranted and true financial positions for warranty claim quantum.

Business valuation is the final step in warranty claim quantification. The expert values the target under the warranted financial position and the true financial position, with the difference representing diminution in value.

Valuation methodology depends on the nature of the business and available data. Common approaches include earnings multiples, discounted cash flow, and transaction comparables. Instructions must use standard market value definitions.

Inspired Education v Crombie [2025] is a critical warning: valuation expert evidence was fatally undermined where instructions were inconsistent with commonly used definitions of market value.

Methodology

  • Select appropriate valuation methodology
  • Apply market value definitions consistently
  • Value under warranted and true scenarios
  • Calculate diminution in value

Frequently Asked Questions

What valuation methodology is used in warranty claims?
The appropriate methodology depends on the business and available data. Earnings multiples, DCF, and transaction comparables are common. The expert must apply the same methodology consistently to both warranted and true position scenarios.
Why do valuation instructions matter so much?
Inspired Education v Crombie [2025] shows that instructions inconsistent with standard market value definitions fatally undermine valuation evidence. Instructions must align with how courts and opposing experts understand valuation concepts.
Can the same expert value and quantify accounting adjustments?
Yes. Forensic accountants commonly perform both the accounting analysis (establishing true vs warranted position) and the valuation (quantifying diminution in value) in a single expert report.

Instruct a Warranty Claim Expert Witness

Connect with qualified forensic accountants specialising in UK M&A disputes. We respond within one business day.